durkin62:

lunarherald:

durkin62:

wtfantisjws:

intotheabyss1488:

It’s not about hate…it’s about love. We as White Nationalists simply wish to preserve our own people! We must stop White Genocide! 😖😞😣😎😡

If you are not being systematically killed for being white, you cannot say that you are experiencing “white genocide”. People have actually suffered, died, and been killed because of genocide, and you think you can claim genocide despite NONE OF THIS happening to you?
Inb4 “BUT MUH WHITE POPULATION!” Okay? So procreate more. There is nothing stopping you.
-Jin

There is literally a genocide of white people going on in Africa right now 

And that is relevant how?
The OP was clearly equating race mixing to white genocide.
Jin was merely pointing out that race-mixing is not a genocide in the slightest and even stated that a white genocide would be a systematic killing of people for being white, which doesn’t contradict your reply.

No they’re claiming white people have never experienced genocide. I’ve been following them for a long period now, not only are they oblivious to this and previous genocides, but they literally believe nobody ever targets white people for being white. 

durkin62:

lunarherald:

durkin62:

wtfantisjws:

intotheabyss1488:

It’s not about hate…it’s about love. We as White Nationalists simply wish to preserve our own people! We must stop White Genocide! 😖😞😣😎😡

If you are not being systematically killed for being white, you cannot say that you are experiencing “white genocide”. People have actually suffered, died, and been killed because of genocide, and you think you can claim genocide despite NONE OF THIS happening to you?

Inb4 “BUT MUH WHITE POPULATION!” Okay? So procreate more. There is nothing stopping you.

-Jin

There is literally a genocide of white people going on in Africa right now 

And that is relevant how?

The OP was clearly equating race mixing to white genocide.

Jin was merely pointing out that race-mixing is not a genocide in the slightest and even stated that a white genocide would be a systematic killing of people for being white, which doesn’t contradict your reply.

No they’re claiming white people have never experienced genocide. I’ve been following them for a long period now, not only are they oblivious to this and previous genocides, but they literally believe nobody ever targets white people for being white. 

Uhm, no. Goddamn it, fucking no. This kind of shit has to stop.

Uhm, no. Goddamn it, fucking no. This kind of shit has to stop.

(via misadventuresofmylife)

(via hhachii)

brikhouse-arts:

Made progress on the new main cast shots this evening. They will double as buttons at future cons!

brikhouse-arts:

Made progress on the new main cast shots this evening. They will double as buttons at future cons!

phrux:

claudiaboleyn:

poppypicklesticks:

cannabli5s:

antifeministbeauty:

micdotcom:

Artists uses Disney princes to highlight domestic abuse’s least visible victims

Follow micdotcom

There needs to be more of this.  Too many people think domestic violence is only against women.

it makes me mad that this has waaaay less notes than the female version

its tumblr

The posts that say we need feminism because girls are literally demonised for liking pumpkin spice are going to get more notes then anything to do with male victims of rape or domestic violence 

Yeah, great post, great message, but blimey can we stop with the whole ‘if this was a female version it would have way more notes nobody cares about male victims bla bla bla’. 

Because let me tell you right now that it’s feminism and feminists that are campaigning for an end to gender roles and Patriarchy, WHICH IS THE THING THAT MAKES PEOPLE THINK MALE VICTIMS SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS SERIOUSLY AS FEMALE ONES. 

It’s just such a weak and backhanded crappy statement. This is a post about men that suffer from domestic violence. But you still have to derail it to get in a little point about how tumblr feminists are bad and evil. 

Grow up. This is serious stuff. 

You care about male victims of domestic violence? You fight against gender roles and the patriarchy. You don’t use this important post as an opportunity to get at feminists on tumblr. If you cared about male victims, let’s face it, you wouldn’t do that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey

There is a long history of feminists denying male abuse survivors. There is a long history of feminists claiming that they’re not doing so. There is a long history of feminists saying that they support male survivors, that they’re working on the issue, that they’re fighting the patriarchy which will solve everything.

There is next to no evidence that feminists are actually doing anything about it.

scdk-nsfw:

people need to stop saying “should” or “need” when giving people suggestions, and go for “could” instead.

It’s more polite, especially when your opinion was highly subjective to begin with. …

…and even then, your ‘improvements’ might still be taken as an offense to the artist’s vision:

Character doesn’t have breasts 4 times her head-size? “breasts need to be bigger”.
Hips not 2 times her shoulder-width? “You should give her wider hips”

Just…no. Make your own characters, break their aesthetics by giving them ridiculous bodyshapes. Go nuts. Just stop trying to make others change theirs to fit your fetish-level “preferences”.

thatonegirludontknow:

I did a study of this gorgeous individual! As soon as I saw those photos, I knew I wanted to draw her.
No lie, those curls were daunting. But it got to be a lot of fun once I pushed past the intimidation!! I had a blast with this painting. Thanks for the great ref, indikos. (:
(Full view if possible, please! Looks a lot better.)

thatonegirludontknow:

I did a study of this gorgeous individual! As soon as I saw those photos, I knew I wanted to draw her.

No lie, those curls were daunting. But it got to be a lot of fun once I pushed past the intimidation!! I had a blast with this painting. Thanks for the great ref, indikos. (:

(Full view if possible, please! Looks a lot better.)

odinsblog:

BLACK MAN SHUTS DOWN THE POLICE

YouTube is full of videos where young white men, often times armed, stand up to police and force the officers to back down. With African-Americans, however, the rules are often different and knowing your rights will get you Tasered or worse. One African-American man recorded an encounter with police where he avoided getting arrested or shοt while preserving his rights.

When cops knocked on his door looking for a fugitive, Avel Amarel was determined to record the incident and not allow officers to illegally enter his home, according to a video posted on TheFreeThoughtProject.com.

Police told Amarel that they wanted to search his home because of an incident that occurred in the parking lot, but Amarel told the officers that the person they were looking for was not inside his home and he wasn’t allowing police to enter without a warrant.

Officer, I can’t let you inside without a search warrant,” he says.

Early in the encounter, an officer attempts to get Amarel to stop recording cell phone video, using the excuse that he didn’t know what the object was. Amarel informed the officer that the object in question was a cell phone and continued recording.

Throughout the video, Amarel refuses to let up, asking officers for three forms of identification. The officers never present any ID, but ask Amarel for ID, but he refuses. Amarel asks the officers whether he’s suspected of a crime and when the officers explain again about the fugitive, Amarel tells them that only he and his family are at the home.

When one officer asks for permission to search the home, Amarel tells him to come back with a warrant. Eventually the officers leave in frustration.

image

(h/t blacklikemoi.com)

(via phrux)

durkin62:

wtfantisjws:

“We don’t need feminism because its major supporting statistics are parroted mindlessly with a blatant confirmation bias, and feminists overanalyze everything and refuse to accept that some things are pure coincidence.”

(via why-we-dont-need-feminism)

Major supporting statistics. You just said it, statistics do actually support it. You just aren’t trying to hear it because it’s not convenient for you, but when someone “mindlessly parrots” statistics that support what you believe, they’ll forever be your talking points.

"Overanalyzing everything" Um you do know there’s such a thing as implications, and that anything can have them, right?

-Jin

Its major supporting statistics. You forgot the key part, the statistics is chooses to use. I can find statistics supporting or opposing both sides of the same issue. Finding a number in your favor doesn’t make your beliefs fact, studies twist information, omit information, and just fucking lie. 

And you have to prove the implications before we accept that shit.